Paula Badosa Gibert vs Tena Lukas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Lukas analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Lukas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.19% of points on their second serve, while Lukas has won 40.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 55.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lukas has won 58.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.7% and 44.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 65.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukas has saved 49.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Lukas winning 60.53% (W/L 46/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibert winning 1 times and Lukas being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gibert winning 2 and Lukas winning 0. The last match between Gibert and Lukas was at the W25 Essen, 29-05-2019, Second, Clay with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Lukas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gibert winning 0 times and Lukas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 0, and Lukas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.5 while Lukas has played against players with an average rank of 257.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukas has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 44.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukas has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
10
Total
1
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
2
Main
1
Minor
118
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
64% (347-196)
Career Total W/L
58% (425-312)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$5,050,999
Career Prize Money
$31,490
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paula Badosa Gibert vs Tena Lukas For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibert VS Lukas
stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Tena Lukas |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 70% (31/44) | 47% (25/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (21/31) | 64% (16/25) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (6/13) | 14% (4/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 62% (33/53) | 39% (17/44) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Tena Lukas
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Tena Lukas |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 56% (18/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 55% (43/35) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/249) | 51% (355/342) |
Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 58% (18/13) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.21 |
Aces Total | 81 | 72 |
DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.63 |
DFs Total | 111 | 212 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:47:43 |
Avg Opp Rank | 217.41 | 245.66 |
1st Serve % | 59% (1021/1716) | 59% (1369/2325) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (666/1021) | 59% (802/1369) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (328/695) | 41% (388/956) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (81/181) | 53% (170/323) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (684/1623) | 49% (1126/2294) |
Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/12) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 56% (18/32) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 50% (7/14) |
1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 78% (18/14) |
1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 22% (18/4) |
1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 29% (14/4) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tena Lukas
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Gibert Vs Lukas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Lukas photos here.